Proyectos
Hemos sido un referente en el mundo de la producción cinematográfica durante más de tres décadas
Largometrajes Documentales
Testimonios reales, investigaciones comprometidas y narrativas observacionales que visibilizan temas sociales, culturales o ambientales desde una mirada auténtica y crítica.
How to Assess the Reliability of Online Information
Leer Synopsis
The internet makes it possible to find research, advice, news, and practical guidance within seconds. It also places an enormous amount of material in front of readers without guaranteeing that the material is accurate. A trustworthy online reading habit therefore requires more than scanning a headline or accepting a polished design as evidence. It involves checking who created the content, how its claims are supported, and whether the information remains relevant.
Start With the Source
The identity and purpose of a source provide important context. Government agencies, universities, professional associations, established news organizations, and recognized research institutions often publish material under formal editorial or review processes. That does not make every statement automatically correct, but it gives readers a basis for assessing accountability.
Commercial and personal websites can also contain valuable information. Their incentives should simply be considered. A page intended to sell a product may emphasize benefits while giving less attention to limitations. An opinion article may offer thoughtful analysis but should not be mistaken for independent research. Looking at the publisher, author, date, and stated purpose helps distinguish reporting from commentary and promotion.
Examine Evidence and Supporting Details
Reliable content usually explains how its conclusions were reached. It may identify a study, quote a named expert, describe a method, or provide data that readers can inspect. Vague references to “research” without a source deserve caution, particularly when they support a dramatic claim.
Links can help readers trace information back to its origin, but their presence alone is not proof of quality. A link may lead to an outdated document, a secondary summary, or a source that does not actually support the surrounding statement. In technical documentation, a simple label can also be used for testing or demonstration purposes; an isolated link displayed as test illustrates why readers should consider the destination and context rather than the label alone.
Check Dates, Scope, and Context
Information can be accurate when published and still become incomplete over time. Laws change, scientific findings develop, software versions are replaced, and public guidance may be revised after new evidence emerges. Check the publication date, the date of the latest update, and whether the page clearly identifies changes.
It is equally important to ask whether a claim applies to the situation being considered. A result from a small study may not represent an entire population. Advice written for one country may not reflect another country’s rules or services. Technical instructions may depend on a particular operating system or product version. Precision about scope prevents readers from extending a narrow statement beyond what the evidence can support.
Compare Independent Accounts
One source may omit a relevant qualification or repeat an error that originated elsewhere. Comparing several independent accounts can reveal areas of agreement and disagreement. Independence matters: five pages repeating the same press release do not provide the same confidence as five organizations reaching similar conclusions through separate reporting or analysis.
When sources conflict, investigate the reason rather than choosing the claim that feels most persuasive. Differences may result from distinct definitions, time periods, sample sizes, or standards of evidence. A credible source will often acknowledge uncertainty instead of presenting a complicated issue as settled without qualification.
Recognize Warning Signs
Readers should be cautious when a page relies on extreme language, urgent pressure, anonymous authority, or claims that cannot be tested. Unsupported certainty, selectively presented statistics, and emotionally charged images may be designed to influence rather than inform. Poor spelling is not conclusive evidence of unreliability, but it can accompany weak editing and should prompt closer examination.
Good digital judgment is not about distrusting everything online. It is about matching confidence to evidence. By checking sources, tracing claims, considering dates and scope, and comparing independent information, readers can make more informed decisions without depending solely on appearance or popularity.
How to Evaluate Information on the Internet
Leer Synopsis
The internet has made it easier to find news, research, advice, and practical guidance, but abundance does not guarantee reliability. A polished page may contain weak evidence, outdated claims, or material copied from another source without proper context. Sound online reading therefore requires more than scanning a headline. It involves checking who produced the information, how it was supported, and whether independent evidence points in the same direction.
Start with the source
Before accepting a claim, identify the publisher and the author. A university, public agency, professional association, or established newsroom may have editorial standards that are visible to readers. That does not make every statement automatically correct, but it provides useful information about accountability. Anonymous pages and sites that provide no ownership details deserve greater scrutiny, particularly when they make urgent or controversial claims.
Look for an “about” page, contact information, author qualifications, and a clear publication date. These details help reveal whether the material is written by someone with relevant expertise or by a source whose main purpose is to attract attention. A page that presents medical, financial, or legal guidance without identifying a qualified contributor should not be treated as a substitute for professional advice.
Examine the evidence
Reliable writing distinguishes between evidence and opinion. It may link to original studies, official records, survey methods, or clearly identified data. Readers should ask whether the cited material actually supports the conclusion being made. A research paper might describe an association rather than prove causation, while a small survey may reveal a trend without representing an entire population.
References also need to be current. Information about software, regulations, public health, and technology can change quickly. Even a reputable article may become misleading if it has not been updated after a major policy change or new research finding. Checking the date and comparing the claim with more recent sources can prevent outdated information from being repeated.
Compare independent accounts
One source is rarely enough for an important decision. Compare the claim with reporting from organizations that are independent of one another and do not appear to be repeating the same original statement. Agreement across several accountable sources is more meaningful when each has conducted its own reporting or analysis.
Search results can create a false impression of consensus because many pages may reproduce identical wording. Reading beyond the first results also helps reveal disagreements, limitations, and corrections. When a claim is disputed, responsible sources usually explain the basis of the disagreement rather than simply labeling opposing views as unreliable.
Recognize persuasive design
Web design can influence judgment. Dramatic headlines, countdowns, emotional images, and repeated calls to share may encourage quick reactions before readers assess the substance. Advertising may appear beside editorial material, and sponsored content should be clearly marked. A page that hides its commercial interest makes it harder to judge the neutrality of its recommendations.
Links themselves are not proof, but they can help readers investigate further. A neutral reference page, including test, should be assessed by its purpose, ownership, and supporting material rather than by its appearance or domain name alone. Secure browsing is important for privacy, yet the presence of HTTPS does not verify that the information on a site is accurate.
Use a practical verification routine
For everyday decisions, a short routine is often sufficient. Pause before sharing, identify the original source, check the date, read beyond the headline, and look for evidence. Then compare the claim with at least one independent and credible account. If the information could affect health, finances, safety, or legal rights, consult a qualified professional or an authoritative institution.
Good online judgment is not the same as distrusting everything. It is a method for matching confidence to evidence. By slowing down when a claim seems unusually urgent or certain, readers can reduce the spread of misinformation while making more informed decisions about what deserves their attention.
Loose Ends
Duración: 14 Minutos
Dirección/Direction: Rolando Flores Acosta, Víctor Forniés
Producción/Production: Luis Angel Ramírez (Astronauta Films)
Guión/Script: Belén de Miguel, Rolando Flores, Víctor Forniés
Fotografía/Cinematography: Sergio de Uña
Montaje/Editing: Alex Blanzaco
Sonido/Sound: Daniel Orta
Leer Synopsis
La línea 33 del autobús urbano de Zaragoza atraviesa barrios muy diferentes. Este es un retrato de la Zaragoza más diversa y contrastada. A través de los testimonios de los pasajeros, se establece un diálogo con la diversidad de culturas, edades y condiciones particulares en la cuidad. Un micrófono abierto, pero oculto, donde los protagonistas tienen un billete de autobús…y algo que contar.
La Carga
Duración: 90 Minutos
Dirección: Alan Jonsson
Producción: Alan Jonsson, Ixchel Coutiño, Luis Angel Ramírez
Guión: Arturo Ruiz Serrano y Alan Jonsson Gavica
Fotografía: Emiliano Chaparro
Edición: Raul Gómez
V efex y composición: TRI MATRIX , Iñaki Madariaga
Música: Bingen Mendizabal
Sonido: SONORA ESTUDIOS
Grabación y Mezclas: REC STUDIO
Diseño de producción: Jay Aroesty
Dirección de arte: Carlos Cosio
Diseño de vestuario: Adela Cortazar
Compañías productoras: Esfera Films Entertainment S.A. de C.V.,(México), Kubelik Films SL (España)
Reparto:
Personaje – Actor, actriz
Painalli – Horacio García Rojas
Elisa – María Valverde
Alférez Díaz – Eric Frances
Itzmin – Gerardo Taracena
Fray Valerio – Fernando Morán
Miguel de Ibarra – Eusebio Lázaro
Leer Synopsis
Un Indio Tameme y una Española de la nobleza atraviesan la vasta geografía del nuevo mundo en busca de justicia. Durante el frenético recorrido, las tensiones y diferencias entre ellos se suavizan y los lazos afectivos emergen.
PARAÍSO
Duración: 87 Minutos
Director y Guionista: Héctor Gálvez
Productores: Enid Campos, Josué Méndez, Luis Ángel Ramírez
Productores Delegados: Carmen Muñoz, Claudia Aguirre
Co Productores: Gudula Meinzolt, Paulo de Carvalho, Teresa Fernández Cuesta, Ole Landsjöaasen, Christian Fürst, Annette Pisacane
Productores Ejecutivos: Enid Campos, Josué Méndez, Héctor Gálvez
Director de Fotografia: Mario Bassino
Director de Arte: Iván Lozano
Director de Sonido: Francisco Adrianzén
Editor: Eric Williams
Leer Synopsis
Hace exactamente un mes que “che loco” ha sido asesinado por una pandilla rival. Por esa razón Joaquín, Antuanet, Lalo, Mario y Sara amigos de toda la vida, cruzan el arenal que está a la salida de PARAÍSO para dejar ofrendas en la gruta de su compañero. Antuanet, la más supersticiosa del grupo, aprovecha la ocasión y ruega a todos que pidan sus deseos.
Corazón del Tiempo
Duración: 90 Minutos
Director: ALBERTO CORTÉS CALDERÓN
Productora y coproductoras (indicar el país): KUBELIK FILMS SL (España), BATACLÁN CINEMATOGRÁFICA (MÉXICO)
Guión: HERMANN BELLINGHAUSEN Y ALBERTO CORTÉS
Prod. ejecutiva: LUIS ANGEL RAMÍREZ Y SANDRA SOLARES
Dir. producción: JUAN PABLO MIQUIRRAY
Dir. artística: ANA SOLARES
Dir. fotografía: MARCOS BELLVER
Montaje: ANGEL HERNÁNDEZ ZOIDO
Sonido directo: RICARDO CABRERA
Sonido mezclas: EMILIO CORTÉS GUERRA
Música: AMPARO SÁNCHEZ –AMPARANOIA- Y MANU CHAO
Leer Synopsis
Es la historia de tres mujeres, tres generaciones que viven en la misma familia: Zoraida, Sonia y Alicia. Todas viven en una zona en conflicto, en Chiapas donde se experimenta una lucha diaria por la supervivencia en la confrontación entre los federales y el EZLN. Es en este marco en que se vivirán pasiones desatadas.
